Bio
The short version: Jill Miller Zimon writes the topical blog, Writes Like She Talks (www.writeslikeshetalks.com) and often highlights the paucity of...
 
 
 
 

Most Popular

Under Secretary for Economic Affairs and Performs the Duties of the Deputy Secretary, Rebecca M. Blank

  • Share This Post
  • Pin It
  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Jobs. The economy. Small business. Start-ups. Venture capital. These perennial issues get a lot of play in posts and comments at BlogHer.com. Who better to add to the catalogue of information and affirmation about the role women have in those areas than Dr. Rebecca M. Blank, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs and performs the duties of the Deputy Secretary?

Throughout her career, Dr. Blank has written extensively on family income issues, and on topics related to women’s labor force participation. She has worked on a host of related policies while at the Council of Economic Advisors in the 1990s and through her involvement with various policy advisory committees and boards.

Dr. Blank's biography is expansive and, frankly, a bit intimidating. But through a few questions to which she responded, it's clear that she is incredibly in touch with the challenges we face and the opportunities before us.

BH: Your 1998 book, It Takes a Nation: A New Agenda for Fighting Poverty, was published more than a decade ago and yet it seems as though the choices being contemplated by the Obama administration and the US Congress couldn’t be more entangled in the issues you covered then (and that I know I studied as a sociology and government major in the early 1980s!). So two questions:

What steps do you think hold the most promise for extricating ourselves from these problems?

There’s no magic bullet for reducing poverty. After the recent deep recession, one of the most important things we can do is continue to grow the economy, assuring that jobs are available to all those who seek them. In the past, I’ve written several papers looking at the impact of the macroeconomy on poverty and it’s clear that high unemployment rate is closely correlated with poverty and lower incomes.

For these reasons, President Obama has called for key investments that will make America stronger – in innovation and export promotion so that American business can thrive and so job creation is strong. It’s also why much of the attention of this Administration in its first two years has focused on helping America recover from the deep recession that was in place when we took office. While reforming financial markets might seem a long way from anti-poverty policy, making sure that the financial collapse that occurred in 2008 is never repeated is important to assure jobs and long-term economic growth.

Another key policy response to poverty is assuring that all American children have access to good schools and an adequate education, so that they have the skills needed to work and earn an adequate income for their families. More jobs in the future will require higher education, and investments in education programs are crucial to ensure that the next generation is prepared with the skills they need to succeed in the workplace. The President has called for the preparation of an additional 100,000 science and math teachers, and vowed to make college more accessible and affordable by strengthening our community colleges and permanently extending the American Opportunity Tax Credit. These investments will help achieve the President’s goal of having the highest proportion of college graduates in the world by 2020.

BH: Based on your personal and professional experience, how do and how can women contribute to those problem-solving steps?

More women hold senior professional positions than ever before in the workplace. Women’s lived experiences differ in various ways from men’s lives. This means that women can sometimes bring new perspectives and insights to the table as decision-makers. There is clear evidence that higher-quality decisions occur when they are made by a group that is diverse in background, ideas and experience. As women progress in the working world, we will continue to see the value of their contributions. In particular, women are often more sympathetic to challenges that both men and women can face in reconciling their family responsibilities with their work responsibilities.

A high share of those in poverty are less-skilled single mothers, raising children on their own. Their ability to escape poverty

  • 3
  • Sparkle (
    )
     

Comments

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
theoutcast 5 pts

Just keep these conversations going. Not enough women are engaged in this topic and it is so important. Personally, I think we've got to make economics sexy. I'm always brainstorming! I live in L.A. and I'm trying to weasel my way around and look for avenues to peddle my strange ideas.

The Walmart case is certainly on my watch list. The corporate-friendly judges worry me very much. I think it will be a referendum on the court if they fail to rule in favor of the women. We'll know exactly where they stand.

I would hope all hell would break loose if that's the case, but I worry most women will remain in their slumber.

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.

Jill Miller Zimon 5 pts

Thanks for reading and commenting, Heather. I completely agree with you. I thank BlogHer for having this interview posted especially at this time because it dovetails so well with why the issues in the Wal-Mart class action case now in SCOTUS are so critical (the whole notion of the sociological underpinnings of how the pervasive undervaluing created an environment that was, in and of itself, biased against and discriminatory toward women, even without any one person actually BEING biased toward a woman but rather part of an entire system that kept the bias intact).

I really like your notion about needing to think about how we move money differently. Sigh - I've always been attractive to the human-intensive fields of work, that revolve around outcomes related to humans (as opposed to profits or goods).

What do we next!? :)

Jill Writes Like She Talks ( http://www.writeslikeshetalks.com )

In The Arena: Jill Miller Zimon, Pepper Pike City Council Member ( http://jillmillerzimon.blogspot.com )

theoutcast 5 pts

This is very interesting! Her responses convey the "stuck" and repetitive ideas that economists tend to work within -- and which is holding women and mothers back.

Our economic system is archaic, patriarchal and the way we move money MUST change. It's that simple -- move the money differently. Clearly we know what doesn't work. So why continue repeating it?

We only have to look at Scandanavian countries to see how well women and mothers are doing. There are tremendous family supports there which would very easy to implemented here. Women get grants when they have babies -- ALL women.

It would be smarter to do that because our money is backed -- not by gold -- but human capital.

An investment in human capital (educated families -- not just the poor) by the government instead of the Federal Reserve would create a financial boon on so many levels.

No one pays attention to moms, by the maternal system when properly supported would fundamentally end the need for so many others trying to prop up people in improverished situations!

I wrote a post called "You'll Need to Pay Me To Make Another Capitalist" that expands on my ideas. And we should do it!

Jill -- you are after my own heart with this post because I "heart" economics. It's the blood of our society and it has been tainted. Nurse! Stat!

Heather blogs about Motherhood & Other Offensive Situations at http://www.ultimateoutcasts.com.